From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ministers Life Casualty Union v. Haase

U.S.
Dec 5, 1966
385 U.S. 205 (1966)

Summary

granting the State's motion to dismiss the insurance company's appeal for lack of substantial federal question

Summary of this case from Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. v. N.J. Dep't of Banking & Ins.

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.

No. 634.

Decided December 5, 1966.

30 Wis.2d 339, 141 N.W.2d 287, appeal dismissed.

Erwin N. Griswold for appellant.

Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and E. Weston Wood, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, as amicus curiae, in support of appellees.


The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Ministers Life Casualty Union v. Haase

U.S.
Dec 5, 1966
385 U.S. 205 (1966)

granting the State's motion to dismiss the insurance company's appeal for lack of substantial federal question

Summary of this case from Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. v. N.J. Dep't of Banking & Ins.
Case details for

Ministers Life Casualty Union v. Haase

Case Details

Full title:MINISTERS LIFE CASUALTY UNION v . HAASE, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 5, 1966

Citations

385 U.S. 205 (1966)

Citing Cases

People v. United National Life Ins. Co.

We therefore reject the thesis of defendants herein that the issue now before us must turn on the presence of…

Morgan v. Amex Assurance Co.

” See Or. Laws 1967, ch. 359, § 30. The Wisconsin case to which the interim committee member referred appears…