stating that the custody evaluator's "recommendation is not binding on the family court, and is only considered part of the evidence of the best interests of the Child"
Summary of this case from JW v. LWNo. CAAP–14–0000697.
03-01-2016
MHL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. HJKL, Defendant–Appellee.
Peter Van Name Esser, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Thomas E. Crowley, for Defendant–Appellee.
Affirmed.
stating that the custody evaluator's "recommendation is not binding on the family court, and is only considered part of the evidence of the best interests of the Child"
Summary of this case from JW v. LWnoting that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it granted mother sole legal and physical custody because of continued disagreements about timesharing
Summary of this case from DP v. JPFull title:MHL, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. HJKL, Defendant–Appellee.
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawai‘i.
Date published: Mar 1, 2016