From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLearren v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Mar 16, 2009
2:06-0071 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 16, 2009)

Summary

finding substantial evidence to support discounting opinion, including “lack of objective medical evidence in [provider's] treatment notes to support his conclusion.”

Summary of this case from Molnar v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

2:06-0071.

March 16, 2009


ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Griffin in which she recommends Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Record, Document #12, be denied, and the decision of the Commissioner be affirmed. No objections have been filed.

The Court has read and considered the Report and finds the same to be correct in fact and law. The Report and Recommendation is adopted by this Court. For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Motion for Judgment by the Plaintiff is DENIED and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

McLearren v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division
Mar 16, 2009
2:06-0071 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 16, 2009)

finding substantial evidence to support discounting opinion, including “lack of objective medical evidence in [provider's] treatment notes to support his conclusion.”

Summary of this case from Molnar v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

McLearren v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JANET LOUISE McLEARREN, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Northeastern Division

Date published: Mar 16, 2009

Citations

2:06-0071 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Putting aside the pain rating inconsistency, the only explanation for Dr. Eapan's significant limitations is…

Rastetter v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Harrier v. Berryhill, No. 1:17-CV-01163-JAY, 2019 WL 12758078, at *5 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 21, 2019) (“A lack of…