From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Young v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1971
274 N.E.2d 750 (N.Y. 1971)

Summary

applying the de minimis exception to excuse failure to comply strictly with setback requirements under zoning regulation

Summary of this case from Roosevelt Is. Residents Assn v. Roosevelt Is. Op.

Opinion

Argued September 22, 1971

Decided October 7, 1971

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, BERNARD S. MEYER, J.

Edward S. Bentley for appellant.

Adolph Koeppel and William D. Siegel for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

Matter of Young v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 7, 1971
274 N.E.2d 750 (N.Y. 1971)

applying the de minimis exception to excuse failure to comply strictly with setback requirements under zoning regulation

Summary of this case from Roosevelt Is. Residents Assn v. Roosevelt Is. Op.
Case details for

Matter of Young v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAROLD YOUNG et al., Respondents, v. BOARD OF ZONING…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 7, 1971

Citations

274 N.E.2d 750 (N.Y. 1971)
274 N.E.2d 750
325 N.Y.S.2d 417

Citing Cases

Roosevelt Is. Residents Assn v. Roosevelt Is. Op.

d violation is so insignificant as to be totally inconsequential. See, e.g., Dworman v. New York State Div.…

Zwitzer v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Town of Canandaigua

The ZBA expressly found that petitioners demonstrated that strict compliance with the zoning law will cause…