Summary
In Osorio v. Leventhal, 80 NY2d 898, the Court specifically stated that the holding was limited to the specific facts and circumstances of that case.
Summary of this case from Wolfus v. Bd. of Managers of Cent. Park PlaceOpinion
Argued August 26, 1992
Decided August 27, 1992
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, William J. Garry, J. Paul Wooten for appellant.
Martin E. Connor and John M. Leventhal for respondents.
Order reversed and judgment of Supreme Court in proceeding No. 2 granting the petition to validate reinstated for the reasons stated in the dissenting in part memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 185 A.D.2d 964).
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA. Judge TITONE dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division.