From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Michner v. Kern

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1939
23 N.E.2d 19 (N.Y. 1939)

Summary

In Matter of Michner v. Kern (281 N.Y. 689) age forty-five had been fixed as the minimum age requirement for the position of house painter, and that requirement being questioned in the proceeding on authority of Matter of Deodati v. Kern (supra) the petition was dismissed.

Summary of this case from Matter of Twomey v. McNamara

Opinion

Argued September 26, 1939

Decided October 10, 1939

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, STEUER, J.

William C. Chanler, Corporation Counsel ( Charles F. Murphy and Paxton Blair of counsel), for appellants.

Norman Roth for respondent.


Orders reversed and proceeding dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the authority of Matter of Deodati v. Kern ( 280 N.Y. 366). No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Michner v. Kern

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1939
23 N.E.2d 19 (N.Y. 1939)

In Matter of Michner v. Kern (281 N.Y. 689) age forty-five had been fixed as the minimum age requirement for the position of house painter, and that requirement being questioned in the proceeding on authority of Matter of Deodati v. Kern (supra) the petition was dismissed.

Summary of this case from Matter of Twomey v. McNamara
Case details for

Matter of Michner v. Kern

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CARL F.W. MICHNER, Respondent, against PAUL J. KERN et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 10, 1939

Citations

23 N.E.2d 19 (N.Y. 1939)
23 N.E.2d 19

Citing Cases

Matter of Twomey v. McNamara

" In Matter of Michner v. Kern ( 281 N.Y. 689) age forty-five had been fixed as the minimum age requirement…

Figueroa v. Bronstein

Petitioner contends that the classification based solely upon age bears no reasonable relation to the purpose…