From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kimberly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Summary

holding that foster parents had no statutory right to intervene in factfinding stage of termination proceedings, but did have right to intervene in dispositional phase of proceeding given custody nature of proceeding

Summary of this case from In re Jonathan G

Opinion

March 12, 1993

Appeal from the Oneida County Family Court, Morgan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Balio, Fallon and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly denied the foster parents' motion to intervene in this termination of parental rights proceeding based on mental illness or retardation and permanent neglect (see, Social Services Law § 384-b [c], [d]). Although the foster parents have had continuous care of the child for more than 12 months, Social Services Law § 383 (3) does not confer upon them the right to intervene in all aspects of such proceedings. Section 383 (3) limits that right to "any proceeding involving the custody of the child". A fact-finding hearing conducted pursuant to article 6 of the Family Court Act on a petition for termination of parental rights based upon permanent neglect does not involve custody issues (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147). Rather, the sole purpose of that hearing is to determine whether the child has been permanently neglected (Family Ct Act § 622; see also, Social Services Law § 384-b; Family Ct Act § 614 [a]-[d]; Albany County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Earl M., 143 Misc.2d 931, 933). Issues relating to custody are reserved for the dispositional hearing phase of the proceeding (Family Ct Act § 614 [e]; § 623; see also, Carrieri, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Law of N.Y., Book 52A, Social Services Law § 383, at 488). Because intervention was sought prior to the fact-finding hearing, the motion was properly denied (see, Albany County Dept. of Social Servs. v. Earl M., supra).


Summaries of

Matter of Kimberly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

holding that foster parents had no statutory right to intervene in factfinding stage of termination proceedings, but did have right to intervene in dispositional phase of proceeding given custody nature of proceeding

Summary of this case from In re Jonathan G
Case details for

Matter of Kimberly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KIMBERLY J., a Child Alleged to be Neglected

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 146

Citing Cases

Matter of Tiffany H

Moreover, she was entitled "as a matter of right," in accordance with Social Services Law § 383 (3), to…

Matter of James V

rt reserved decision at the close of the fact-finding hearing to obtain another psychological evaluation of…