From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Jordan v. Meisser

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 8, 1971
274 N.E.2d 444 (N.Y. 1971)

Summary

In Matter of Jordan v. Meisser (29 N.Y.2d 661, app. dsmd. 405 U.S. 907) also cited by the majority, the courts upheld a State-line distinction.

Summary of this case from Neale v. Hayduk

Opinion

Argued September 7, 1971

Decided September 8, 1971

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County EDWIN R. LYNDE, J.

Arthur D. Goldstein for appellant.

J. Kemp Hannon for respondents.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General ( Cornelius F. Donahue, Ruth Kessler Toch and Jack W. Hoffman of counsel), in his statutory capacity under section 710 of the Executive Law.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON. Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.


Summaries of

Matter of Jordan v. Meisser

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 8, 1971
274 N.E.2d 444 (N.Y. 1971)

In Matter of Jordan v. Meisser (29 N.Y.2d 661, app. dsmd. 405 U.S. 907) also cited by the majority, the courts upheld a State-line distinction.

Summary of this case from Neale v. Hayduk
Case details for

Matter of Jordan v. Meisser

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WAYNE P. JORDAN, Appellant, v. WILLIAM D. MEISSER et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 8, 1971

Citations

274 N.E.2d 444 (N.Y. 1971)
274 N.E.2d 444
324 N.Y.S.2d 954

Citing Cases

Neale v. Hayduk

This is a legitimate distinction drawn to achieve demonstrably reasonable ends. It is important to note, for…

Echevarria v. Carey

"2. A voter may enroll with a party if he did not enroll on the day of the annual enrollment * * * (c)…