Summary
In Matter of Doe v Kuriansky (59 N.Y.2d 836, affg for reasons stated below 91 A.D.2d 1068), a hospital sought to quash a subpoena seeking the names of patients and certain medical information concerning them contained in nonmedical records.
Summary of this case from Grand Jury v. KurianskyOpinion
Decided June 7, 1983
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOHN S. THORP, JR., J.
Gerald Walpin for appellant.
Edward J. Kuriansky, pro se, and Richard D. Carruthers for Edward J. Kuriansky, respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 A.D.2d 1068; see, also, Matter of Grand Jury Investigation of Onondaga County, 59 N.Y.2d 130; Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings [ Doe], 56 N.Y.2d 348).
Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.