From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Borra v. Siwanoy Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 24, 1952
280 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Summary

In Matter of Borra v. Siwanoy Country Club (280 App. Div. 906, motion for leave to appeal denied 304 N.Y. 985) we held, "Whether claimant was subjected to unusual strain is an issue of fact.

Summary of this case from Matter of Johnston v. St. Regis Paper Company

Opinion

September 24, 1952.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.


Claimant was employed as a headwaiter in a country club. The employer operated a golf club and restaurant wherein it served regular meals consisting of lunches and dinners six days a week. In addition there were many special affairs and parties held in the club from time to time. On the evening of the alleged accident a large buffet supper and dance was held at the club and preparations were made for an anticipated 350 guests. While the affair was going on, claimant complained of symptoms which were afterwards diagnosed as the beginning of a heart attack. He was compelled to sit down because of these symptoms. Early the next morning his condition became worse and he was removed to a hospital where his difficulty was diagnosed as an acute coronary occlusion. The board found that he suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment and due to unusual exertion. Appellants contest the award on the basis that there is no substantial evidence, viewing the record as a whole, to sustain the finding of an industrial accident, or to sustain the finding of causal relation. Whether claimant was subjected to unusual strain is an issue of fact. The mere fact that he was performing his customary duties does not necessarily exclude the finding that on the occasion in question he was subjected to unusual strain. We think under the doctrine enunciated in Matter of Masse v. Robinson Co. ( 301 N.Y. 34) that the board could find an accidental injury under the circumstances disclosed. Whether a particular event was an industrial accident is not to be determined by any legal definition but by the common sense viewpoint of the average man. If the facts and circumstances sustain upon any reasonable hypothesis the conclusion that an average man would view the event as accidental then the determination of the board is final ( Matter of Broderick v. Liebmann Breweries, 277 App. Div. 422). Decision and award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Foster, P.J., Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., taking no part.


Summaries of

Matter of Borra v. Siwanoy Country Club

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 24, 1952
280 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

In Matter of Borra v. Siwanoy Country Club (280 App. Div. 906, motion for leave to appeal denied 304 N.Y. 985) we held, "Whether claimant was subjected to unusual strain is an issue of fact.

Summary of this case from Matter of Johnston v. St. Regis Paper Company
Case details for

Matter of Borra v. Siwanoy Country Club

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SECONDO BORRA, Respondent, against SIWANOY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Rubin v. Elite Store Cleaners

The proof indicates that he had previously enjoyed fair health and that his attack came suddenly and without…

Matter of Sereno v. A-1 Amusement Co.

" The legal test is not thus restricted, and "The mere fact that [claimant] was performing his customary…