rejecting contention that “Rehaif requires the Government to prove he knew not only his status, but also that he knew his status prohibited him from owning a firearm”
Summary of this case from McReynolds v. United StatesNo. 20-1167
05-24-2021
Jose Susumo Azano MATSURA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
rejecting contention that “Rehaif requires the Government to prove he knew not only his status, but also that he knew his status prohibited him from owning a firearm”
Summary of this case from McReynolds v. United StatesFull title:Jose Susumo Azano MATSURA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States.
Date published: May 24, 2021
979 F.3d 697, 727 (9th Cir. 2020), cert. denied sub nom. Matsura v. United States, 210 L.Ed.2d 833 (May 24, …
United States v. YatesWhen confronted with this argument-that the government has to prove the individual knew he was prohibited…