From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mateo v. Vosbrink

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Jul 18, 2006
No. 5:06-CV-115-SPM (N.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2006)

Summary

finding no imminent injury where plaintiff had not received requested Jewish dietary accommodation and had foregone meals and parts of meals causing constant hunger and hunger pangs

Summary of this case from O'Neal v. Rush

Opinion

No. 5:06-CV-115-SPM.

July 18, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE


THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 5) filed June 7, 2006. The parties have been furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. To date, no objections have been received.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is hereby denied.
3. This case is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to refile his suit and pay the entire $350 filing fee upon filing.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mateo v. Vosbrink

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division
Jul 18, 2006
No. 5:06-CV-115-SPM (N.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2006)

finding no imminent injury where plaintiff had not received requested Jewish dietary accommodation and had foregone meals and parts of meals causing constant hunger and hunger pangs

Summary of this case from O'Neal v. Rush
Case details for

Mateo v. Vosbrink

Case Details

Full title:KEM MATEO, a/k/a KIM MATEO, Plaintiff, v. M. VOSBRINK, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Panama City Division

Date published: Jul 18, 2006

Citations

No. 5:06-CV-115-SPM (N.D. Fla. Jul. 18, 2006)

Citing Cases

O'Neal v. Rush

Plaintiff's statements do not support the existence of an imminent danger of serious physical injury when…

Lawson v. Pa Dep't of Corr.

Lawson's allegations about food do not provide sufficient, detailed information regarding alleged dangers to…