From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Celebrezze

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 4, 1965
351 F.2d 467 (3d Cir. 1965)

Summary

In Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467 (3d Cir. 1965) (per curiam), a Social Security disability case, the Secretary asked the district court to remand so he could take additional evidence.

Summary of this case from Finkelstein v. Bowen

Opinion

No. 15226.

Argued September 23, 1965.

Decided October 4, 1965.

W.J. Krencewicz, Shenandoah, Pa., for appellant.

Morton Hollander, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., John W. Douglas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Sherman L. Cohn, Edward Berlin, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.


The order from which this appeal has been taken is interlocutory, not final. It is unappealable. 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

The appeal will be dismissed.


Summaries of

Marshall v. Celebrezze

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Oct 4, 1965
351 F.2d 467 (3d Cir. 1965)

In Marshall v. Celebrezze, 351 F.2d 467 (3d Cir. 1965) (per curiam), a Social Security disability case, the Secretary asked the district court to remand so he could take additional evidence.

Summary of this case from Finkelstein v. Bowen
Case details for

Marshall v. Celebrezze

Case Details

Full title:Joseph P. MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Anthony J. CELEBREZZE, Secretary of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Oct 4, 1965

Citations

351 F.2d 467 (3d Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

II. The general principle enunciated by this court is that district court orders remanding cases to…

Whitehead v. Califano

" Orders of remand, when entered by a district judge, have normally been held not to be final and thus not…