From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MacIntyre v. MacIntyre

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 31, 2005
472 Mich. 882 (Mich. 2005)

Summary

In MacIntyre, our Supreme Court concluded that the circuit court in that case was able to make an independent custody determination without an evidentiary hearing. Id.

Summary of this case from Shannon v. Ralston

Opinion

No. 127963.

March 31, 2005.


SC: 127963, COA: 255368, Oakland CC: 02-667376-DM.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 11, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals in part. MCL 600.5080(2) requires a "review" of the child custody decision. The parties' agreements may not waive the availability of an evidentiary hearing if the circuit court determines that a hearing is necessary to exercise its independent duty under the Child Custody Act, MCL 722.25. But as long as the circuit court is able to "determine independently what custodial placement is in the best interests of the children[,]" Harvey v. Harvey, 470 Mich 186, 187 (2004), an evidentiary hearing is not required in all cases. In this case, the Oakland Circuit Court was able to make such an independent determination without a hearing. We REMAND the case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.


Summaries of

MacIntyre v. MacIntyre

Supreme Court of Michigan
Mar 31, 2005
472 Mich. 882 (Mich. 2005)

In MacIntyre, our Supreme Court concluded that the circuit court in that case was able to make an independent custody determination without an evidentiary hearing. Id.

Summary of this case from Shannon v. Ralston

In MacIntyre, our Supreme Court concluded that the circuit court in that case was able to make an independent custody determination without an evidentiary hearing. Id.

Summary of this case from Turkal v. Schwartz
Case details for

MacIntyre v. MacIntyre

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK JOSEPH MacINTYRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REGINA MAUREEN…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Mar 31, 2005

Citations

472 Mich. 882 (Mich. 2005)
693 N.W.2d 822

Citing Cases

Waterman v. Waterman

Although a trial court has an obligation to act in the child's best interests and retains the authority to…

Turkal v. Schwartz

"[A]s long as the circuit court is able to determine independently what custodial placement is in the best…