Summary
affirming declaratory judgment that appellant's position as Mayor of Borough of Kennett Square created appearance of conflict of interest with appellant's employment as private investigator
Summary of this case from In re Application of CladerOpinion
December 11, 1984.
Public officials — Appearance of conflict of interest.
1. Public officials must avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest. [380]
Submitted on briefs October 15, 1984, to Judges ROGERS, DOYLE and COLINS, sitting as a panel of three.
Appeal, No. 3440 C.D. 1983, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County in case of J. Stephen Little v. James R. Freeman, Esquire, District Attorney of Chester County, Pennsylvania, No. 101 July Term, 1982.
Action for declaratory judgment filed by Mayor of Borough of Kennett Square in Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, seeking determination that no conflict of interest exists. Cross motions for summary judgment filed. Motion of Mayor denied. Motion of District Attorney granted. GAWTHROP, J. Mayor filed exceptions. Exceptions overruled. Mayor appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed.
William J. Gallagher, with him, Mary Ann Rossi, MacElree, Harvey, Gallagher, O'Donnell Featherman, Ltd. James P. MacElree, II, District Attorney of Chester County, with him, Francis J. Capaldo, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Appellant, J. Stephen Little, appeals from a decision in a declaratory judgment action in which the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County held that Appellant's position as Mayor of the Borough of Kennett Square created the appearance of a conflict of interest with Appellant's employment as a private investigator.
See Section 7532 of the Declaratory Judgments Act, 42 Pa. C. S. § 7532.
Appellant is the duly elected Mayor of the Borough of Kennett Square, and is also employed as a private investigator under the license of James Richard Schaefer. Appellant brought an action for declaratory judgment upon the belief that the Chester County District Attorney (Appellee) was considering action to revoke the license of Mr. Schaefer based upon an actual or apparent conflict of interest created by Appellant's position as mayor. Appellant submitted an affidavit in which he stated that as mayor he has potential access to certain police records, but that neither he, nor any other employee under the license of Mr. Schaefer, would conduct private investigations in the Borough of Kennett Square. Cross motions for summary judgment were filed, and summary judgment was granted in favor of Appellee. Appellant's exceptions to the court's judgment were denied, and appeal to this Court followed.
Appellant is an employee of Mr. Schaefer. See Section 13 of The Private Detective Act of 1953, Act of August 21, 1953, P.L. 1273, as amended, 22 P. S. § 23.
In his Answer, Appellee admitted that such action was being considered.
Section 1121 of The Borough Code, Act of February 1, 1966, P.L. (1965) 1656, as amended, 53 P. S. § 46121, confers upon the Mayor full charge of the Chief of Police and of the police force.
We affirm on the basis of the able and well reasoned opinion of Judge ROBERT S. GAWTHROP, III in Little v. Freeman, ___ Pa. D. C.3d ___ (1983), and cite with approval the court's holding that despite Appellant's intention not to conduct private investigations in the Borough of Kennett Square, his position as mayor of that borough creates at least the appearance of a conflict of interest with his position as a private investigator, and that, where public officials are involved, even the appearance of a conflict of interest should be avoided. See Commonwealth v. Gregg, 262 Pa. Super. 364, 396 A.2d 797 (1979); Stanley Appeal, 204 Pa. Super. 29, 201 A.2d 287 (1964).
ORDER
NOW, December 11, 1984, the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County in the above referred matter, dated November 8, 1983, is hereby affirmed.