Summary
dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction because trial court's order denying motion to modify the conditions of pretrial bond is not appealable
Summary of this case from Perkins v. StateOpinion
No. 04-06-00538-CR.
Delivered and Filed: December 13, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appeal from the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2004-CR-9012, Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding.
Sitting: SARAH B. DUNCAN, Justice, KAREN ANGELINI, Justice, SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Joseph William Lewis filed a notice of appeal from the trial court's order denying Lewis's motion to modify the conditions of his pretrial bond. "The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law." Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). We know of no authority granting a right to appeal pretrial an order setting a condition on pretrial bail. See Bridle v. State, 16 S.W.3d 906, 908 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2000, no pet.) (dismissing for want of jurisdiction Bridle's appeal from order requiring ignition interlock device installed on vehicle as a condition of pretrial bond). Accordingly, we ordered Lewis to file a response showing cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond to our order. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.