Summary
reaching same conclusion in same case on habeas corpus
Summary of this case from People v. DoolittleOpinion
No. 441.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of California.
Jurisdictional statement submitted December 17, 1932. January 9, 1933.
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539; Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co., 242 U.S. 559; Merrick v. N.W. Halsey Co., 242 U.S. 568; Sloman v. Security Trust Co., 281 U.S. 704; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U.S. 86, 109; Bandini Co. v. Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Sprales v. Binford, 288 U.S. 374, 393. Mr. Jesse I. Miller for appellant. Messrs. U.S. Webb and Tracy Chatfield Becker for appellee. Reported below: 215 Cal. 536; 12 P. (2d) 3.