Summary
dismissing the § 1983 claims that the plaintiff did not address in the response to the motion to dismiss
Summary of this case from Eckstrom v. Cmty. Educ. Ctrs., Inc.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3210.
May 12, 2011
ORDER
AND NOW, on this 12th day of May, 2011, upon careful consideration of Defendants Borough of Newtown's, Anthony Wojciechowksi's, Lee Matthews's, and John Does 1-10's Motion to Partially Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 21), and Plaintiff's opposition (ECF No. 26), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part, in accordance with the accompanying Memorandum.