From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kohler v. In-N-Out Burgers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-5054-GHK (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2013)

Summary

holding that plaintiff's ADA claim for injunctive relief was moot, reasoning that the defendant had remedied physical problems with the stall, grab bar, a mounted paper towel dispenser, and the exit door

Summary of this case from McCarthy v. Chan B. Luong

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 12-5054-GHK (JEMx)

2013-09-17

Chris Kohler, Plaintiff, v. In-N-Out Burgers dba In-N-Out Burgers # 52, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's September 12, 2013 Order granting Defendant In-N-Out Burger's ("Defendant") Motion for Summary Judgment against Plaintiff Chris Kohler ("Plaintiff"), IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's ADA claims that have been remedied by Defendant are DISMISSED as moot and all remaining ADA claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Also pursuant to the Court's September 12, 2013, Order it is further ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to their reassertion in state court. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

GEORGE H. KING

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Kohler v. In-N-Out Burgers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 17, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-5054-GHK (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2013)

holding that plaintiff's ADA claim for injunctive relief was moot, reasoning that the defendant had remedied physical problems with the stall, grab bar, a mounted paper towel dispenser, and the exit door

Summary of this case from McCarthy v. Chan B. Luong

holding that plaintiff's ADA claim for injunctive relief was moot, reasoning that the defendant had remedied physical problems with the stall, grab bar, a mounted paper towel dispenser, and the exit door

Summary of this case from Gray v. Cnty. of Kern

dismissing ADA claims as moot where the plaintiff conceded the remediation work was complete

Summary of this case from Simpson v. CHS, Inc.
Case details for

Kohler v. In-N-Out Burgers

Case Details

Full title:Chris Kohler, Plaintiff, v. In-N-Out Burgers dba In-N-Out Burgers # 52…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. CV 12-5054-GHK (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 17, 2013)

Citing Cases

Vogel v. Om Abs, Inc.

Because Plaintiff has presented no evidence that the pipes are susceptible to contact with patrons, there is…

Thomas v. West

Once a defendant embarks on construction to bring its building into compliance, it would be illogical to…