Summary
In King v. Winchell (248 A.D. 809 [4th Dept. 1936]) the court affirmed, without opinion, a judgment dismissing a complaint upon the close of the plaintiff's case.
Summary of this case from Locke v. GibbonsOpinion
June, 1936.
Present — Sears, P.J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur except Sears, P.J., and Edgcomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to go to the jury on the question of defamation. (The judgment is for defendant in a slander action.)