From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

King v. Winchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Summary

In King v. Winchell (248 A.D. 809 [4th Dept. 1936]) the court affirmed, without opinion, a judgment dismissing a complaint upon the close of the plaintiff's case.

Summary of this case from Locke v. Gibbons

Opinion

June, 1936.

Present — Sears, P.J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur except Sears, P.J., and Edgcomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the evidence was sufficient to go to the jury on the question of defamation. (The judgment is for defendant in a slander action.)


Summaries of

King v. Winchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

In King v. Winchell (248 A.D. 809 [4th Dept. 1936]) the court affirmed, without opinion, a judgment dismissing a complaint upon the close of the plaintiff's case.

Summary of this case from Locke v. Gibbons
Case details for

King v. Winchell

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH J. KING, Appellant, v. WALTER WINCHELL and Others, Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 809 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Locke v. Gibbons

In Singler v. Journal Co. ( 218 Wis. 263; 260 N.W. 431) the court said: "Due to the fact that this was a…

Gautier v. Pro-Football, Inc.

To hold that the mere fact of sponsorship makes the unauthorized use of an individual's name or picture on…