From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kentucky Bar Association v. Turnbull

Supreme Court of Kentucky
Dec 4, 2000
31 S.W.3d 926 (Ky. 2000)

Summary

In Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Turnbull, 31 S.W.3d 926 (Ky. 2000), this Court found an attorney guilty of failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing his client, and failing to keep his client reasonably informed and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information (SCR 3.130 (1.3) and SCR 3.130 (1.4)(a), respectively).

Summary of this case from Ky. Bar Ass'n v. Teater

Opinion

2000-SC-0726-KB.

Entered November 22, 2000. Final December 4, 2000.


OPINION AND ORDER


The Kentucky Bar Association (KBA) charged Respondent, Stephen Rice Turnbull, with failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, and failing to keep a client reasonably informed and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information. SCR 3.130-1.3, SCR 3.130-1.4(a). After review, the KBA Board of Governors recommended that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days. Since Respondent failed to request a review of the Board's recommendation, SCR 3.370(8), the recommendation is adopted. SCR 3.370(10).

In January 1998, Don Hale hired Respondent to represent him in a divorce proceeding. During that representation, the Domestic Relations Commissioner determined that Hale and his wife shared an equal interest in a vehicle. Following this finding, Respondent asked Hale if he desired that exceptions be filed to this finding. Hale replied affirmatively as his father held a lien upon the vehicle, and, shortly thereafter, Hale gave Respondent the appropriate documentation. Months passed with no communication between Respondent and Hale. Respondent never filed the exceptions and never answered Hale's inquiries concerning his case.

Upon these facts, the Inquiry Commission charged Respondent with the aforementioned violations of SCR 3.130-1.3 and SCR 3.130-1.4(a). Respondent was served with the two count charge, but failed to answer. The charge was forwarded to the KBA Board of Governors as a default proceeding. The Board found Respondent guilty of both counts and recommended a thirty-day suspension.

Upon the foregoing facts and charges, the Board of Governors' recommendation is adopted and it is hereby ordered that:

1. Respondent, Stephen Rice Turnbull, is suspended from the practice of law in Kentucky for a period of thirty days. This period of suspension shall commence on the date of entry of this Opinion and Order.

2. In accordance with SCR 3.450, Respondent is directed to pay all costs associated with these disciplinary proceedings against him, said sum being $94.26, and for which execution may issue from this Court upon finality of this Opinion and Order.

All concur.


Summaries of

Kentucky Bar Association v. Turnbull

Supreme Court of Kentucky
Dec 4, 2000
31 S.W.3d 926 (Ky. 2000)

In Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Turnbull, 31 S.W.3d 926 (Ky. 2000), this Court found an attorney guilty of failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing his client, and failing to keep his client reasonably informed and to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information (SCR 3.130 (1.3) and SCR 3.130 (1.4)(a), respectively).

Summary of this case from Ky. Bar Ass'n v. Teater
Case details for

Kentucky Bar Association v. Turnbull

Case Details

Full title:KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION, COMPLAINANT v. STEPHEN RICE TURNBULL, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Kentucky

Date published: Dec 4, 2000

Citations

31 S.W.3d 926 (Ky. 2000)

Citing Cases

Ky. Bar Ass'n v. Teater

Further, we adopt the Board’s recommended discipline in full. In Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Turnbull , 31 S.W.3d…