Summary
In Kennard Law P.C. the Fourth Department rejected an attempt to set aside a confession of judgment based upon the claim that the merchants cash advance agreement was really a usurious loan.
Summary of this case from Spin Capital v. Tex. Med. Ctr. SupplyOpinion
1024 CA 21-00473
11-12-2021
KENNARD LAW P.C., Doing Business as Kennard Law, and Alfonso Kennard, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HIGH SPEED CAPITAL LLC, Defendant-Respondent.
AMOS WEINBERG, GREAT NECK, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. STEIN ADLER DABAH & ZELKOWITZ, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (CHRISTOPHER R. MURRAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
AMOS WEINBERG, GREAT NECK, FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
STEIN ADLER DABAH & ZELKOWITZ, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (CHRISTOPHER R. MURRAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.