Summary
finding no genuine issue of fact when the defendants disputed they received "kytes" putting them on notice of a sexual assault
Summary of this case from Riedesel v. Thurston Cnty. JailOpinion
Civil No. 04-0009-PK.
October 24, 2008
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Papak has issued a Findings and Recommendation [154] in this action. The Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [141] should be granted. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. United States Dist. Ct., 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).
No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Findings and Recommendation [154] is adopted and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [144] is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.