From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 20, 1994
316 S.C. 70 (S.C. 1994)

Summary

In Johnson, the employer owned a chemical processing plant and assumed the general contractor's role in constructing the plant after terminating the original general contractor.

Summary of this case from Tatum v. Medical University of S.C

Opinion

24099

Heard May 5, 1994

Decided June 20, 1994

Appeal From Circuit Court, Greenville County Frank P. McGowan, Jr., Judge.

Joseph A. Mooneyham, of Harris Graves, P.A., Greenville, for appellant. Saunders M. Bridges, Jr. and Gena Phillips Ervin, of Bridges, Orr, McEachin, Derrick Ervin, Florence, for respondent.


After careful consideration, we decline to adopt the "dual purpose" doctrine as the law of South Carolina. See Parker v. Williams and Madjanik, Inc., 275 S.C. 65, 267 S.E.2d 524 (1980); 2A Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law §§ 72:80; 72:81 (C) (1993). Accordingly, the circuit court order is affirmed.

/s/ David W. Harwell C.J. /s/ A. Lee Chandler A.J. /s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr. A.J. /s/ Jean H. Toal A.J. /s/ James E. Moore A.J.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 20, 1994
316 S.C. 70 (S.C. 1994)

In Johnson, the employer owned a chemical processing plant and assumed the general contractor's role in constructing the plant after terminating the original general contractor.

Summary of this case from Tatum v. Medical University of S.C
Case details for

Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service

Case Details

Full title:Jill Johnson, Appellant, v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, S.C.…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 20, 1994

Citations

316 S.C. 70 (S.C. 1994)
447 S.E.2d 184

Citing Cases

Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina

Our Court has rejected the "dual capacity" doctrine. Johnson v. Rental Uniform Service of Greenville, 316…

Tatum v. Medical University of S.C

More recently, our supreme court has expressly declined to expand the dual capacity doctrine on the facts…