From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Izzo v. Illinois

U.S.
Apr 18, 1960
362 U.S. 403 (1960)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

declining to remand for nunc pro tunc competency determination in light of ambiguities regarding legal significance of psychiatric testimony, but remanding for new hearing to determine petitioner's present competency to stand trial

Summary of this case from State v. Connor
See 1 Summary

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.

No. 772, Misc.

Decided April 18, 1960.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Summaries of

Izzo v. Illinois

U.S.
Apr 18, 1960
362 U.S. 403 (1960)

declining to remand for nunc pro tunc competency determination in light of ambiguities regarding legal significance of psychiatric testimony, but remanding for new hearing to determine petitioner's present competency to stand trial

Summary of this case from State v. Connor
Case details for

Izzo v. Illinois

Case Details

Full title:IZZO v . ILLINOIS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 18, 1960

Citations

362 U.S. 403 (1960)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

It has also been stated that a litigant has no right, constitutional or otherwise, to have his case tried…

State v. Tumminello

Mr. Justice Douglas speaking for a unanimous Court, held that a bench conference on the propriety of a…

11 Citing Cases