From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Feb 14, 1994
93 Ohio App. 3d 153 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)

Summary

stating that an unsigned judgment entry is not a final appealable order

Summary of this case from Whetzel v. Starkey

Opinion

Nos. 64754 64755.

Decided February 14, 1994.

Appeal from the Common Pleas Court, Juvenile Division, Cuyahoga County.

Thomas P. Gill, for appellant.

Celestine Suttles, Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services, for appellee. Alix Ann Wintner, guardian ad litem for children.


This case is dismissed sua sponte for lack of a final appealable order as required by Civ.R. 54(B). The journal entry of November 30, 1992, which purports to be the final order, does not bear the signature of the trial judge.

This court will not accept a rubber stamp in lieu of a judge's signature. Civ.R. 58(A) clearly mandates that once a decision has been announced, the court shall cause the judgment to be prepared and sign the judgment. As the judgment entry was not signed by the trial court, it is not a final appealable order, and is invalid for appellate purposes. See Brackmann Communications, Inc. v. Ritter (1987), 38 Ohio App.3d 107, 526 N.E.2d 823; William Cherry Trust v. Hofmann (1985), 22 Ohio App.3d 100, 22 OBR 288, 489 N.E.2d 832; see, also, State ex rel. Indus. Comm. v. Day (1940), 136 Ohio St. 477, 17 O.O. 86, 26 N.E.2d 1014; State v. Ginocchio (1987), 38 Ohio App.3d 105, 526 N.E.2d 1366.

The Civil Rules are applicable to the juvenile court pursuant to the introduction to the rules given by the juvenile court in the Local Rules of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Juvenile Division.

For the foregoing reason, this case is dismissed. The parties may move to reinstate this action within thirty days of obtaining a final appealable order.

Appeal dismissed.

NUGENT and DYKE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Feb 14, 1994
93 Ohio App. 3d 153 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)

stating that an unsigned judgment entry is not a final appealable order

Summary of this case from Whetzel v. Starkey
Case details for

In re Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:In re MITCHELL et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Feb 14, 1994

Citations

93 Ohio App. 3d 153 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)
637 N.E.2d 989

Citing Cases

State v. Anderson

Crim.R. 32(C) provides that the judge who presides over the proceedings which culminated in the judgment must…

Whetzel v. Starkey

It logically follows that if the opinion is not an effective judgment, then it cannot be a final order. See…