From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mcintyre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 4, 2001
564 Pa. 670 (Pa. 2001)

Summary

holding wrongful intent precludes amendment

Summary of this case from In re Nomination Petition of Beyer

Opinion

Submitted: April 30, 2001.

Decided: May 4, 2001.

Appeal No. 19 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 2001 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered 4/24/01 at No. 145 MD 2001 granting Petition to Set Aside Nomination Petition.

Appeal No. 20 W.D. Appeal Dkt. 2001 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court entered 4/24/01 at No. 146 MD 2001 granting Petition to Set Aside Nomination Petition.

Robert Matthew Owsiany, Pittsburgh, for appellant, Daniel McIntyre.

James Paul Coletta, Carnegie, for appellees, Samuel Mahfood and James T. Weikel.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.


ORDER


AND NOW this 4th day of May, 2001, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED. The Application for Stay Pending Appeal and Motion for Expedited Argument are DISMISSED as moot.


Summaries of

In re Mcintyre

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 4, 2001
564 Pa. 670 (Pa. 2001)

holding wrongful intent precludes amendment

Summary of this case from In re Nomination Petition of Beyer
Case details for

In re Mcintyre

Case Details

Full title:In re Nomination Petitions of Daniel McINTYRE, Democratic Nomination for…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 4, 2001

Citations

564 Pa. 670 (Pa. 2001)
770 A.2d 326

Citing Cases

In re Rankin

Upon further review, this Court issued a unanimous per curiam order affirming the order of the Commonwealth…

In re Mlinarich

Our Supreme Court affirmed. See In re McIntyre , 564 Pa. 670, 770 A.2d 326 (2001). In In re Nomination…