From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Hinds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 14, 2008
48 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Summary

finding that a corporate officer was not unemployed where he performed activities to wind up corporation but still gained financially from the business

Summary of this case from Bachman v. Bachman Associates

Opinion

No. 503007.

February 14, 2008.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 28, 2006, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Gregory C. Hinds, New City, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Rose and Malone Jr., JJ.


Claimant was the sole officer and shareholder of a computer programming consulting corporation. He ceased offering his services as of August 31, 2005. Claimant thereafter filed an application for unemployment insurance benefits effective September 5, 2005 and took various measures to wind up the corporation, including processing business mail, providing information to his accountant, writing checks on the corporate bank account, paying business-related expenses and taxes, and depositing money representing his final paycheck into his personal checking account. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately determined that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits for the period of September 5, 2005 through December 13, 2005 on the basis that he was not totally unemployed during that period. Claimant now appeals.

The corporation was formally dissolved on January 6, 2006.

We affirm. It is well settled that "`a corporate officer who performs activities in connection with the winding up of a corporation will not be considered totally unemployed, even if his or her activities in this regard are minimal'" ( Matter of Downton [Commissioner of Labor], 45 AD3d 1088, 1089, quoting Matter of Bigelow [Commissioner of Labor], 13 AD3d 1022, 1022-1023). Since claimant gained financially from the business after he filed for benefits, the Board's decision will not be disturbed ( compare Matter of Salomone [Commissioner of Labor], 34 AD3d 1037, 1038).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Hinds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 14, 2008
48 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

finding that a corporate officer was not unemployed where he performed activities to wind up corporation but still gained financially from the business

Summary of this case from Bachman v. Bachman Associates
Case details for

In re Hinds

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of GREGORY C. HINDS, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 14, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 874 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1278
851 N.Y.S.2d 286

Citing Cases

In re Deangelo

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Kane and Stein, JJ. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment…

Bachman v. Bachman Associates

Several recent New York cases have held that a corporate officer who performs minimal services for a…