Summary
noting that the Ninth Circuit strictly construes the bar date rule but allowing equitable tolling when the court misleads creditors by citing an erroneous bar date
Summary of this case from In re MarinoOpinion
Nos. 93-56526, 93-56531.
The panel unanimously find this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4.
Decided April 19, 1995.
Greg L. Eriksen, Levine Eriksen, Orange, CA, for appellant Halstead.
Mark D. Wagner, Law Offices of Mark D. Wagner, Santa Ana, CA, for appellee Schreiber.
Charles W. Tourdot, Fullerton, CA, for appellees Bryant, Warren, Hooper, Madsen, and Racing.
Appeals from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
ORDER
We AFFIRM, and adopt the opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, 158 B.R. 485 (9th Cir. BAP 1993), as the opinion of this court.
AFFIRMED.