From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Frankel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 24, 2003
839 A.2d 174 (Pa. 2003)

Summary

In Matter of Jeffrey Harris Frankel, 576 Pa. 211, 839 A.2d 174 (2003), 576 Pa. 211, 839 A.2d 174 (2003), Mr. Frankel was disbarred on consent in 1996 after he converted $7,500 of client funds and used the monies to purchase drugs to support his growing addiction to prescription medication.

Summary of this case from In re Lord

Opinion

October 24, 2003.

No. 205 Disciplinary Docket, No. 3 — Supreme Court, No, 93 DB 1995 — Disciplinary Board, Attorney Registration No. 34647, (Montgomery County).


ORDER


AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2003, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated August 11, 2003, the Petition for Reinstatement is DENIED.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement,


Summaries of

In re Frankel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Oct 24, 2003
839 A.2d 174 (Pa. 2003)

In Matter of Jeffrey Harris Frankel, 576 Pa. 211, 839 A.2d 174 (2003), 576 Pa. 211, 839 A.2d 174 (2003), Mr. Frankel was disbarred on consent in 1996 after he converted $7,500 of client funds and used the monies to purchase drugs to support his growing addiction to prescription medication.

Summary of this case from In re Lord
Case details for

In re Frankel

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEFFREY HARRIS FRANKEL. PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 24, 2003

Citations

839 A.2d 174 (Pa. 2003)
576 Pa. 211

Citing Cases

In re Lord

Petitioner Lord's situation is certainly different. He has no history of failed attempts at sobriety and he…