From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Kam

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 9, 2014
No. 05-14-00088-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 9, 2014)

Summary

dismissing Justin Kam's appeal of the Peyton judgment, per agreement of the parties

Summary of this case from In re Kam

Opinion

No. 05-14-00088-CV

06-09-2014

IN THE ESTATE OF ROBERT S. KAM, DECEASED


DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 9, 2014.

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-1368-3


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Brown

Opinion by Justice Lang

Before the Court is the parties' joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The parties have informed the Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant the parties' motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2).

__________


JUSTICE
140088F.P05

JUDGMENT

IN THE ESTATE OF: ROBERT S. KAM, DECEASED No. 05-14-00088-CV

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3,

Dallas County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-1368-3.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices

Myers and Brown, participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, David Kam, recover his costs of this appeal from appellant, Justin Kam.

__________

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE


Summaries of

In re Estate of Kam

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Jun 9, 2014
No. 05-14-00088-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 9, 2014)

dismissing Justin Kam's appeal of the Peyton judgment, per agreement of the parties

Summary of this case from In re Kam
Case details for

In re Estate of Kam

Case Details

Full title:IN THE ESTATE OF ROBERT S. KAM, DECEASED

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Jun 9, 2014

Citations

No. 05-14-00088-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 9, 2014)

Citing Cases

In re Kam

Justin's appeal was dismissed by agreement in 2014.See In re Estate of Kam, No. 05-14-00088-CV, 2014 WL…

In re Estate of Kam

Litigation in that case was ongoing at the time of trial, and the parties in that case recently settled on…