Summary
discussing the operation of 11 U.S.C. § 551
Summary of this case from In re Knights Athletic Goods, Inc.Opinion
No. 86-2557.
July 26, 1989.
Michael N. Zundel of Jardine, Linebaugh, Brown Dunn, Salt Lake City, Utah, for plaintiff-appellant.
Peter W. Billings, Jr. (Gary E. Jubber with him on the brief), of Fabian Clendenin, Salt Lake City, Utah, for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah.
Before McKAY, BARRETT, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
We affirm the decision of the district court which reversed, in part, the bankruptcy court. We affirm for the reasons given in the district court's opinion which we have directed to be published. 103 B.R. 276. The rule established in that opinion is that 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) (1982) providing for equitable apportionment prevails over a contrary state rule providing for nonapportionment of rents. In this we join the Second Circuit. S W Holding Co. v. Kuriansky, 317 F.2d 666 (2d Cir. 1963).
The district court correctly found that the bankruptcy court erred in refusing to add interest to the amount secured by the landlord's lien. The landlord is entitled to interest on the full $85,000 accruing from May 1, 1984, to May 18, 1984. To the extent that it can be read otherwise, the district court opinion is reversed on that point.
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.