Summary
holding that Wells standard was met because the defendants were sued in their individual capacities
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of HarrimanOpinion
No. 92-2037.
May 26, 1993.
Appeal from the W.D.Mich.
AFFIRMED.
holding that Wells standard was met because the defendants were sued in their individual capacities
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of HarrimanNo. 92-2037.
May 26, 1993.
Appeal from the W.D.Mich.
AFFIRMED.
holding that Wells standard was met because the defendants were sued in their individual capacities
Summary of this case from Moore v. City of Harrimanapproving the district court's reliance on Dixon as establishing this requirement
Summary of this case from Claybrooks v. Primus Automotive Financial Servicesobserving that like pain, the side effects of medications can have a significant impact on an individual's ability to work and should figure in the disability determination process
Summary of this case from Jones v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.In Diamond Club, the Sixth Circuit addressed "the proper legal standards for determining when an arson by a corporate officer and a concealment of material information bearing on the arson by that officer may be imputed to the corporation for purposes of barring the corporation's recovery under a fire insurance policy."
Summary of this case from Tipsy Toad, Inc. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co.applying arbitrary and capricious standard of review where pension plan contained similar language
Summary of this case from Beauchamp v. DaimlerChrysler CorporationFull title:In re: Cadillac Wildwood Development Corp. Cadillac Wildwood Development…
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Date published: May 26, 1993
It contends "the limitation periods for Title VII actions 'begin to run in response to discriminatory acts…
DeHoyos v. Allstate Corp.As long as class members are allegedly affected by a defendant's general policy and the general policy, here…