From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re App. for Dis., Richard C. Swagler

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 24, 1953
239 Minn. 566 (Minn. 1953)

Summary

suspending for six months an attorney convicted of criminal negligence in which a person died

Summary of this case from In re Disciplinary Action, Andrade

Opinion

No. 36,069.

April 24, 1953.

Attorney and client — suspension of attorney — conviction of criminal negligence.

Proceeding upon the petition of the Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association for the discipline of Richard C. Swagler as an attorney at law of this state. Ordered that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the state for a period of six months.

Robert J. Nowack, for Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association.

Richard E. Kyle and Stephen Schmitt, for respondent.



Proceedings instituted by the Practice of Law Committee of the Minnesota State Bar Association, petitioner, for the disbarment of Richard C. Swagler, respondent, a St. Paul attorney. Both parties agree that no useful purpose would be served by a reference in this matter, and since the facts are all uncontroverted, a determination will be made upon the files and records submitted to this court.

Respondent in December 1952 was convicted of the crime of criminal negligence, and that conviction is the sole ground advanced in support of the motion for summary judgment of disbarment. Counsel for respondent in the criminal proceedings stated that the respondent was driving his car when a man was struck by another car and thrown into the path of respondent's oncoming car which also struck him. The victim died from the injuries received in the accident and the indictment of respondent for the crime of death by criminal negligence followed. At a hearing respondent pleaded guilty, and the case was continued for the purpose of allowing time for a probation officer to conduct an investigation. When the matter again came before the court for sentencing, the court made the following statement:

"* * * the Court has examined the report of the Probation Officer, and I might say for the record, I don't remember of ever having a probation report on a defendant which by and large speaks more highly of a defendant than this one."

The court in passing sentence followed the recommendations of the prosecuting attorney and saw fit not to place respondent on probation, as the court said he normally would be inclined to do, but only to impose a fine.

We are of the opinion that the facts of this case do not warrant the imposition of the extreme penalty of disbarment. The respondent is a young man, 29 years of age, whose record, professional and otherwise, was practically unblemished prior to his conviction for reckless driving. Under the circumstances, it is very doubtful that any occasion for disciplinary action of this lawyer will arise in the future. He should be afforded the opportunity of continuing his profession, and this court, like the court before whom the criminal proceedings were heard, is disposed to leniency in this particular matter. It is therefore ordered that Richard C. Swagler, respondent, be suspended from the practice of law in the state of Minnesota for a period of six (6) months. Let judgment be entered accordingly.


Summaries of

In re App. for Dis., Richard C. Swagler

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 24, 1953
239 Minn. 566 (Minn. 1953)

suspending for six months an attorney convicted of criminal negligence in which a person died

Summary of this case from In re Disciplinary Action, Andrade
Case details for

In re App. for Dis., Richard C. Swagler

Case Details

Full title:IN RE APPLICATION FOR DISCIPLINE OF RICHARD C. SWAGLER

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 24, 1953

Citations

239 Minn. 566 (Minn. 1953)
58 N.W.2d 272

Citing Cases

In re Disciplinary Action, Andrade

1978) (imposing by order after stipulation, along with other conditions, a two-year suspension following…

Matter of Kimmel

1980), that under certain circumstances a felony conviction need not inevitably lead to disbarment. See also…