In Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettebone-Cataract Paper Co. (194 App. Div. 819), the court held, at page 820, that, after the "judge has rendered his decision he is without power to pass upon or make additional findings of fact or rule upon questions of law."
Summary of this case from Tausik v. TausikMay, 1921.
Motion to dismiss appeals granted, unless appellants shall file and serve briefs by July first.
In Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettebone-Cataract Paper Co. (194 App. Div. 819), the court held, at page 820, that, after the "judge has rendered his decision he is without power to pass upon or make additional findings of fact or rule upon questions of law."
Summary of this case from Tausik v. TausikIn Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettebone Cataract Paper Co. (194 App. Div. 819, 821) the court stated: "After a decision has been rendered no substantial change can be made by the trial judge or referee in his report or decision, neither in the findings of fact, nor in the conclusions of law and direction for judgment."
Summary of this case from McLaughlin v. AmodeoFull title:HYDRAULIC POWER COMPANY OF NIAGARA FALLS, Respondent, v…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 1, 1921
Prac. Act, § 440), the suits certainly have not been disposed of (cf. Blau v. Audjill Real Estate Corp., 190…
Siegel v. State of New YorkFor example, a decision that should fail to provide through inadvertence or oversight on the part of the…