From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Ohio

U.S.
May 17, 1965
381 U.S. 275 (1965)

Summary

In Howell, the question as to such charge of the court and comment of counsel was consistently raised from the time when such charge and comment were made. However, in the instant case, no question with respect to any such charge or comment was ever raised until after defendant's petition for certiorari had been denied by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Summary of this case from State v. O'Connor

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

No. 789.

Decided May 17, 1965.

Certiorari granted, judgment vacated and case remanded.

Reported below: 177 Ohio St. 19, 201 N.E.2d 529.

Bernard A. Berkman for petitioner.

Thomas H. Sutherland for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Ohio for further consideration in light of Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Howell v. Ohio

U.S.
May 17, 1965
381 U.S. 275 (1965)

In Howell, the question as to such charge of the court and comment of counsel was consistently raised from the time when such charge and comment were made. However, in the instant case, no question with respect to any such charge or comment was ever raised until after defendant's petition for certiorari had been denied by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Summary of this case from State v. O'Connor
Case details for

Howell v. Ohio

Case Details

Full title:HOWELL v . OHIO

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 17, 1965

Citations

381 U.S. 275 (1965)

Citing Cases

State v. O'Connor

Surprisingly, there were only five such cases. Thereafter, the Supreme Court of the United States remanded…

State v. Hunt

Although entitled thereto without request under our prior decisions, it seems improbable that the court's…