From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of the United States
Aug 5, 2019
140 S. Ct. 17 (2019)

Summary

In Home Depot U.SA., Inc. v. Jackson, 587 U.S. 435 (2019), the Supreme Court held that: “Because in the context of these removal provisions [28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(a) and 1453(b)] the term ‘defendant' refers only to the party sued by the original plaintiff, we conclude that neither provision allows such a third party to remove.

Summary of this case from Badger Contracting Inc. v. Harris

Opinion

No. 17–1471.

08-05-2019

HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., petitioner, v. George W. JACKSON.


Petition for rehearing denied.


Summaries of

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of the United States
Aug 5, 2019
140 S. Ct. 17 (2019)

In Home Depot U.SA., Inc. v. Jackson, 587 U.S. 435 (2019), the Supreme Court held that: “Because in the context of these removal provisions [28 U.S.C. §§ 1441(a) and 1453(b)] the term ‘defendant' refers only to the party sued by the original plaintiff, we conclude that neither provision allows such a third party to remove.

Summary of this case from Badger Contracting Inc. v. Harris
Case details for

Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., petitioner, v. George W. JACKSON.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Aug 5, 2019

Citations

140 S. Ct. 17 (2019)
204 L. Ed. 2d 1172

Citing Cases

Young v. Burlingham

These jurisdictional grants are known as “federal-question jurisdiction” and “diversity jurisdiction, ”…

Young v. Burlingham

These jurisdictional grants are known as “federal-question jurisdiction” and “diversity jurisdiction, ”…