Summary
considering relative means of the parties as one factor in determination under the totality of the circumstances
Summary of this case from Treanor v. Marriott Int'l, Inc.Opinion
11 Civ. 1591 (LBS)
09-20-2012
LARRY HOFF. Plaintiff, v. WPIX, INC., TRIBUNE COMPANY, and BETTY ELLEN BERLAMINO, in her professional and individual capacities, Defendant. WPIX, INC., TRIBUNE COMPANY, and BETTY ELLEN BERLAMINO, in her professional and individual capacities, Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. KAREN SCOTT Third-Party Defendant.
MEMORANDUM &
ORDER
SAND, J.
Before the Court is Third-Party Defendant WPIX, Inc.'s ("WPIX") motion to dismiss Third-Party Defendant Karen Scott's ADEA (29 U.S.C. § 623(d)), NYHRL (New York Exec. Law § 296(7)), and NYCHRL (New York City Admin. Code § 8-107(7)) retaliation claims. The relevant facts and legal arguments are discussed in our memorandum and order deciding a nearly identical motion in the Marchiano v. Berlamino case, which we have also released today. For the reasons stated in that memorandum and order, WPIX's motion is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 20, 2012
New York, NY
_______________
U.S.D.J.