Summary
dismissing FCRA claims that rested on the allegation that the plaintiff never gave his consent to several inquiries in the credit report
Summary of this case from Perez v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLCOpinion
No. 09-1926.
Submitted: May 20, 2010.
Decided: June 8, 2010.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00170-TSE-IDD).
Kenneth Hinton, Appellant Pro Se. Erik J. Grohmann, Paul L. Myers, Strasburger Price, LLP, Frisco, Texas; Keasha Ann Broussard, Barry Goheen, King Spalding, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Jonathan S. Hubbard, Troutman Sanders, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kenneth Hinton appeals the district court's order granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss his second amended complaint alleging claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hinton v. Trans Union LLC, 654 F.Supp.2d 440 (E.D.Va. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.