From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hertz Corporation v. Rentz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 6, 1976
326 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Summary

In Hertz Corporation v. Rentz, 326 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), suit was commenced in Orange county. The only connection with Orange County was the presence of a Hertz agent.

Summary of this case from Florida Power Light Co. v. Troutman

Opinion

No. 75-2255.

February 6, 1976.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frederick Pfeiffer, J.

Brian D. Hill, of Maguire, Voorhis Wells, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Dennis J. Hightower, of Whitaker Koepke Associates, Orlando, for appellees.


This suit was filed in Orange County, seeking damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident occurring in Jackson County, Florida. A defendant seeks review of an order denying its motion for change of venue from Orange to Jackson County pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 47.122 (1973).

A motion for change of venue pursuant to this statute is addressed to the sound judicial discretion of the court. The exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed except upon a clear showing of abuse. Gaboury v. Flagler Hospital, Inc., 316 So.2d 642 (Fla.App.4th, 1975).

The defendants are all nonresidents. The plaintiffs reside in Gadsden County (adjacent to Jackson County). Two eyewitnesses to the automobile accident and two other potential witnesses who arrived on the accident scene within an hour all reside in Jackson County. The accident was investigated by police officers in Jackson County. Some medical treatment was administered to plaintiffs in Jackson County by physicians located there. Additionally, plaintiffs received medical treatment by physicians located in South Georgia and in Tallahassee, Florida. Two eyewitnesses reside in the State of Oklahoma. The only connection which Orange County has with the case is that the nonresident corporate defendant has an agent or representative there.

Under the above facts we conclude (as did the court in Peterson, Howell Heather v. O'Neill, 314 So.2d 808 (Fla. App.3rd, 1975) on closely analogous facts) that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for change of venue pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 47.122 (1973). The order is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hertz Corporation v. Rentz

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 6, 1976
326 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

In Hertz Corporation v. Rentz, 326 So.2d 216 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976), suit was commenced in Orange county. The only connection with Orange County was the presence of a Hertz agent.

Summary of this case from Florida Power Light Co. v. Troutman
Case details for

Hertz Corporation v. Rentz

Case Details

Full title:THE HERTZ CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. MARCIA RENTZ ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 6, 1976

Citations

326 So. 2d 216 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)

Citing Cases

Burger King Corp. v. Koeppel

The decision to transfer venue based upon Section 47.122 is one which is within the sound discretion of the…

Sun Bk. of Ocala v. Intern. Harvester

We find no abuse of discretion in the trial court, under Section 47.122, Florida Statutes (1979) [forum non…