From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henry v. Wilson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 9, 2008
2:06cv1439 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 9, 2008)

Summary

denying Rule 12(b) motion relating to Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim concerning Hepatitis C treatment

Summary of this case from Murray v. Wetzel

Opinion

2:06cv1439.

January 9, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


An in forma pauperis application in the above-captioned prisoner civil rights case was received by the Clerk of Court on October 30, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Document No. 33), filed on November 23, 2007, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Herbick (Document No. 17) be denied and that the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth Defendants Wilson, Maue, Delie, Scire, Tretinik, Brunson, Ellsworth and Burks (Document No. 18) be granted as to Defendants Wilson, Scire, Burks, Brunson and Ellsworth and denied as to Defendants Maue, Delie, and Tretinik. Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation on December 10, 2007 (Document No. 36). Plaintiffs Objections do not undermine the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

After de novo review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th January, 2008

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Herbick (Document No. 17) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED hat the Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth Defendants Wilson, Maue, Delie, Scire, Tretinik, Brunson, Ellsworth and Burks (Document No. 18) is GRANTED as to Defendants Wilson, Scire, Burks, Brunson and Ellsworth and DENIED as to Defendants Maue, Delie, and Tretinik.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 33) filed on November 23, 2007, by Magistrate Judge Lenihan, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Henry v. Wilson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 9, 2008
2:06cv1439 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 9, 2008)

denying Rule 12(b) motion relating to Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim concerning Hepatitis C treatment

Summary of this case from Murray v. Wetzel
Case details for

Henry v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG HENRY, Plaintiff, v. HARRY E. WILSON, Superintendent; MR. FRED MAUE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 9, 2008

Citations

2:06cv1439 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 9, 2008)

Citing Cases

Murray v. Wetzel

Given the severity of its symptoms, and its potential for serious and fatal injuries to those afflicted by…

Smith v. Brackett

rievance can establish personal involvement sufficient to state a medical needs claim. See e.g., Mazza v.…