From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harrison v. Milligan

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 14, 2010
No. C 09-4665 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2010)

Summary

holding that alleged confiscation of "some of [the plaintiff's] incoming and outgoing mail" is not conduct "of sufficient severity that . . . would chill or silence a person or ordinary firmness from future First Amendment activities" (citing Mendocino Env't. Ctr. v. Mendocino Cty., 192 F.3d 1283, 1300 (9th Cir. 1999))

Summary of this case from Matthews v. Ulrich

Opinion

No. C 09-4665 SI (pr).

May 14, 2010


ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. (Docket #2.) The total filing fee due is $350.00. The initial partial filing fee due for the plaintiff at this time is $1.66. The clerk shall send a copy of this order and the attached instructions to the plaintiff, the Pelican Bay State Prison trust account office, and the court's financial office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PAYMENT OF PRISONER'S FILING FEE

The prisoner shown as the plaintiff or petitioner on the attached order has filed a civil action in forma pauperis in this court and owes to the court a filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the fee is to be paid as follows:

The initial partial filing fee listed on the attached order should be deducted by the prison trust account office from the prisoner's trust account and forwarded to the clerk of the court as the first installment payment on the filing fee. This amount is twenty percent of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner's account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint/petition or (b) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint/petition.
Thereafter, on a monthly basis, 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's trust account should be deducted and forwarded to the court each time the amount in the account exceeds ten dollars ($10.00). The prison trust account office should continue to do this until the filing fee has been paid in full.

If the prisoner does not have sufficient funds in his/her account to pay the initial partial filing fee, the prison trust account office should forward the available funds, and carry the balance forward each month until the amount is fully paid.

If the prisoner has filed more than one complaint, (s)he is required to pay a filing fee for each case. The trust account office should make the monthly calculations and payments for each case in which it receives an order granting in forma pauperis and these instructions.

The prisoner's name and case number must be noted on each remittance. The initial partial filing fee is due within thirty days of the date of the attached order. Checks should be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and sent to Prisoner Accounts Receivable, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36060, San Francisco, CA 94102.


Summaries of

Harrison v. Milligan

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 14, 2010
No. C 09-4665 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2010)

holding that alleged confiscation of "some of [the plaintiff's] incoming and outgoing mail" is not conduct "of sufficient severity that . . . would chill or silence a person or ordinary firmness from future First Amendment activities" (citing Mendocino Env't. Ctr. v. Mendocino Cty., 192 F.3d 1283, 1300 (9th Cir. 1999))

Summary of this case from Matthews v. Ulrich
Case details for

Harrison v. Milligan

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS HARRISON, Plaintiff, v. D. E. MILLIGAN; et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 14, 2010

Citations

No. C 09-4665 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. May. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Singh v. Washburn

Singh has also failed to demonstrate that any of Defendants' actions would chill or silence an individual of…

Matthews v. Ulrich

Second, the interference Matthews alleges here does not rise to the level of a constitutional violation…