From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harris v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 18, 2013
CV 12-04709-VBF (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

dismissing petitioner's § 2255 motion with prejudice because it was untimely under the applicable statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Hendricks v. United States
See 1 Summary

Opinion

CV 12-04709-VBF

12-18-2013

DEVON DANTE HARRIS, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Valerie Baker Fairbank

JUDGMENT

In accordance with this Court's Order issued today (denying petitioner's motion for habeas corpus relief), final judgment is hereby entered in favor of respondent United States of America and against petitioner Devon Dante Harris, Junior.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

The Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Summaries of

Harris v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 18, 2013
CV 12-04709-VBF (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)

dismissing petitioner's § 2255 motion with prejudice because it was untimely under the applicable statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Hendricks v. United States
Case details for

Harris v. United States

Case Details

Full title:DEVON DANTE HARRIS, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 18, 2013

Citations

CV 12-04709-VBF (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Tinsley v. Valenzuela

But petitioner neglects to mention precedent standing for the converse proposition, that "[d]ismissal without…

Hernandez v. Lewis

Petitioner may request a certificate of appealability from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth…

5 Citing Cases