From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hairston v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 3, 2015
Case Number 14-13218 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 3, 2015)

Summary

noting that the "Sixth Circuit has consistently upheld the discretion vested in ALJs to weigh conflicting record evidence in assessing a claimant's disability status"

Summary of this case from Weber v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case Number 14-13218

08-03-2015

THERESA HAIRSTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION , DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

Presently before the Court is the report issued on July 7, 2015 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Hluchaniuk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that the Court deny the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment, and affirm the decision of the Commissioner. Although the report stated that the parties to this action could object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [dkt. #20] is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #16] is DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #19] is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

It is further ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED.

s/David M. Lawson

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge
Dated: August 3, 2015

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on August 3, 2015.

s/Susan Pinkowski

SUSAN PINKOWSKI


Summaries of

Hairston v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 3, 2015
Case Number 14-13218 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 3, 2015)

noting that the "Sixth Circuit has consistently upheld the discretion vested in ALJs to weigh conflicting record evidence in assessing a claimant's disability status"

Summary of this case from Weber v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Hairston v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:THERESA HAIRSTON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 3, 2015

Citations

Case Number 14-13218 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 3, 2015)

Citing Cases

Weber v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Accordingly, with these inconsistencies present in the record, the ALJ did not err in giving the MRI findings…

Meddaugh v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

In addition, while Meddaugh testified at the hearing that his medication causes side effects such as…