From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Guardado v. 13 Wall St., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 29, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-2482(DRH)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2016)

Summary

holding that plaintiff had sufficiently proven the employer-employee relationship by stating that he worked in a restaurant owned by defendant, that defendant paid him on a weekly basis by cash and check, and that defendant docked his pay if he missed work

Summary of this case from Nam v. Ichiba Inc.

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-2482(DRH)(SIL)

12-29-2016

JOSE GUARDADO, Plaintiff, v. 13 WALL STREET, INC d/b/a ALMARCO ITALIAN GRILL, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING R & R

HURLEY, Senior District Judge :

Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation, dated December 2, 2016, 2016 of Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke recommending that plaintiff's motion for default judgment be granted and that plaintiffs be granted leave to move for attorneys' fees and costs. More than fourteen days have elapsed since service of the Report and Recommendation and no objections have been filed.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, this Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error, and finding none, now concurs in both its reasoning and its result. Accordingly, this Court adopts the December 2, 2016 Report and Recommendation of Judge Locke as if set forth herein. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that default judgment be entered in favor of plaintiff against defendant and that plaintiff be awarded $67,071.72 in compensatory damages, $55,495.47 in liquidated damages, and $24,379.96 in prejudgment interest for a total award of $146,947.15, plus per diem interest at the daily rate of $16.54 from November 23, 2016 to entry of judgment; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is granted leave to move for attorneys' fees, which motion shall be filed in accordance with the time limits set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). Dated: Central Islip, N.Y.

December 29, 2016

/s/ Denis R. Hurley

Denis R. Hurley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Guardado v. 13 Wall St., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 29, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-2482(DRH)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2016)

holding that plaintiff had sufficiently proven the employer-employee relationship by stating that he worked in a restaurant owned by defendant, that defendant paid him on a weekly basis by cash and check, and that defendant docked his pay if he missed work

Summary of this case from Nam v. Ichiba Inc.
Case details for

Guardado v. 13 Wall St., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE GUARDADO, Plaintiff, v. 13 WALL STREET, INC d/b/a ALMARCO ITALIAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 29, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-2482(DRH)(SIL) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2016)

Citing Cases

Yu Peng Lu v. Nisen Sushi of Commack, LLC

To establish an overtime wage violation, Plaintiff must prove that (1) Plaintiff was an employee of the…

Thompson v. Hyun Suk Park

Under the NYLL, employees are entitled to recover compensation for an extra hour of work at the minimum wage…