From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Goodwin v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 3, 1994
634 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1994)

Summary

involving "UBAL manslaughter and vehicular homicide"

Summary of this case from State v. Anderson

Opinion

No. 81274.

February 3, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Stanton S. Kaplan, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Joan Fowler, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Crim. Law, and Joseph A. Tringali, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


We have for review Goodwin v. State, 610 So.2d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), which certified the following question of great public importance:

Whether a defendant can be convicted and sentenced for UBAL manslaughter and vehicular homicide arising out of one death?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on our opinion in Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1994), we find that the two offenses at issue here are aggravated forms of a single underlying offense distinguished only by degree factors. Multiple punishments thus are not allowed. Section 775.021(4)(b)2., Fla. Stat. (1989). See also Houser v. State, 474 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 1985).

For that reason, we answer the certified question in the negative, quash the decision below to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion, and remand for further proceedings consistent with our views here and with Sirmons. We disapprove the opinion in Murphy v. State, 578 So.2d 410 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion. We decline to address the other issues raised by the parties, which lie beyond the scope of the certified question.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

GRIMES, J., concurs with an opinion, in which SHAW and HARDING, JJ., concur.


I dissented to our decision in Sirmons v. State, 634 So.2d 153 (Fla. 1994). However, I believe that the Legislature could not have intended that a defendant could be convicted of two crimes of homicide for killing a single person.

SHAW and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Goodwin v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 3, 1994
634 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1994)

involving "UBAL manslaughter and vehicular homicide"

Summary of this case from State v. Anderson

In Goodwin, the court held that vehicular homicide and unlawful blood alcohol level manslaughter (UBAL manslaughter) were "aggravated forms of a single underlying offense distinguished only by degree factors."

Summary of this case from Anderson v. State
Case details for

Goodwin v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALEX D. GOODWIN, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 3, 1994

Citations

634 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 1994)

Citing Cases

State v. Anderson

[T]he question this provision raises is what are degrees of the same offense and can two or more crimes be…

Anderson v. State

As is discussed in the dissent, the question this provision raises is what are degrees of the same offense…