Summary
granting summary judgment in a TCPA/FDCPA putative class action, prior to addressing a motion for certification, because there was no genuine dispute that the defendant did not violate the named plaintiff's rights under TCPA or FDCPA
Summary of this case from Cahill v. GC Servs. Ltd.Opinion
Case No.: 2:15-CV-03308-JVS
10-03-2016
SEANA GOODSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DESIGNED RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant.
Mark E. Ellis - 127159 Andrew M. Steinheimer - 200524 Amanda N. Griffith - 288164 ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP 740 University Avenue, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Tel: (916) 283-8820 Fax: (916) 283-8821 mellis@ellislawgrp.com asteinheimer@ellislawgrp.com agriffith@ellislawgrp.com Attorneys for Defendant, DESIGNED RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Mark E. Ellis - 127159
Andrew M. Steinheimer - 200524
Amanda N. Griffith - 288164
ELLIS LAW GROUP LLP
740 University Avenue, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95825
Tel: (916) 283-8820
Fax: (916) 283-8821
mellis@ellislawgrp.com
asteinheimer@ellislawgrp.com
agriffith@ellislawgrp.com Attorneys for Defendant,
DESIGNED RECEIVABLE SOLUTIONS, INC.
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the Court's September 21, 2016 Order granting Defendant Designed Receivable Solutions, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (see Docket No. 59), it is HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff Seana Goodson on Plaintiff's entire Complaint. The putative class claims are dismissed without prejudice. Dated: October 03, 2016
By: /s/_________
Honorable James V. Selna
United States District Court Judge