From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gloria v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 19, 2009
CASE NO. C08-5714RJB-KLS (W.D. Wash. Jun. 19, 2009)

Summary

remanding for further proceedings where it was not clear whether specific mental functional limitations should be treated as subsumed within overall RFC determination

Summary of this case from Bonds v. Astrue

Opinion

CASE NO. C08-5714RJB-KLS.

June 19, 2009


ORDER


The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
(2) the ALJ erred in his decision as described in the report;
(3) the matter is therefore REVERSED and remanded to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings; and
(4) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, defendant's counsel and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.


Summaries of

Gloria v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Jun 19, 2009
CASE NO. C08-5714RJB-KLS (W.D. Wash. Jun. 19, 2009)

remanding for further proceedings where it was not clear whether specific mental functional limitations should be treated as subsumed within overall RFC determination

Summary of this case from Bonds v. Astrue
Case details for

Gloria v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE K. GLORIA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Jun 19, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. C08-5714RJB-KLS (W.D. Wash. Jun. 19, 2009)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Berryhill

o usual work situations. See, e.g., Morinskey v. Astrue, 458 Fed. Appx. 640, 641 (9th Cir. 2011) (finding ALJ…

Bonds v. Astrue

Accordingly, remand for further proceedings is appropriate. See Webb v. Barnhart, 433 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir.…