Summary
In Girardon v. Angelone (259 N.Y. 565) the Court of Appeals, in dismissing an appeal from a judgment for costs entered on an order of the Appellate Division granting a motion to vacate service, stated "that no final judgment has been entered which judicially settles the controversy between the parties".
Summary of this case from Klepper v. Canadian Pacific Ry. Co.Opinion
Submitted April 25, 1932
Decided May 3, 1932
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
Samuel Brand for motion.
No one opposed.
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion, on the ground that no final judgment has been entered which judicially settles the controversy between the parties and is reviewable here on appeal. ( Van Arsdale v. King, 155 N.Y. 325; Kenyon v. Robin, 231 N.Y. 604; Dupay v. Galbina, 235 N.Y. 557.)