From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gibson v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 30, 1910
3 Okla. Crim. 594 (Okla. Crim. App. 1910)

Summary

In Jenkins v. Grant Company et al., 15 N.M. 281, 288, 107 P. 739, 741, we approved language used by the trial court to the effect that "from a practical standpoint the grazing of livestock in this country has no value as evidence of practical location."

Summary of this case from Christmas v. Cowden

Opinion

No. A-236.

Opinion Filed March 30, 1910.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

APPEAL — Dismissal — Defects in Record. When the case-made is not served upon the county attorney, in the time allowed by the court, and the clerk of the court does not certify to the transcript of the record, the appeal cannot be considered either upon the case-made or the transcript of the record, and will be dismissed.

Appeal from District Court, Le Flore County; M.E. Rosser, Judge.

Morris Gibson, the defendant, was convicted of the offense of manslaughter, and sentenced to seven years' confinement in the penitentiary and a fine of $500. Motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were filed and overruled on the 11th day of November, 1908. Defendant was given 90 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made, and appeals. Appeal dismissed.

J.E. Whitehead, for appellant.

Charles L. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


In so far as the record discloses, the case-made was never served upon the county attorney. We must therefore sustain the motion of the Attorney General to strike from the record what purports to be the case-made. There is no certificate of the clerk of the court to the transcript of the record. We therefore are without jurisdiction to consider this attempted appeal either as upon a case-made or upon a transcript of the record.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.


Summaries of

Gibson v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Mar 30, 1910
3 Okla. Crim. 594 (Okla. Crim. App. 1910)

In Jenkins v. Grant Company et al., 15 N.M. 281, 288, 107 P. 739, 741, we approved language used by the trial court to the effect that "from a practical standpoint the grazing of livestock in this country has no value as evidence of practical location."

Summary of this case from Christmas v. Cowden
Case details for

Gibson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS GIBSON v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Mar 30, 1910

Citations

3 Okla. Crim. 594 (Okla. Crim. App. 1910)
107 P. 739

Citing Cases

Christmas v. Cowden

We have invariably pointed to, discussed and relied upon, none other than our two familiar statutes, Sec.…

G O S Cattle Co. v. Bragaw's Heirs

It is next contended by appellant that the possession of appellee was neither open, visible, nor hostile,…